Προς το περιεχόμενο

Προτεινόμενες αναρτήσεις

  • Απαντ. 1,6k
  • Δημ.
  • Τελ. απάντηση

Συχνή συμμετοχή στο θέμα

Δημοσ.

Performance Preview - AMD A4-5000 Kabini Reference Notebook Tested

 

First Look Review: AMD Showcases New Processors

 

Short review: AMD A4-5000 APU "Kabini"

 

 

A Closer Look at the Kabini Die

 

12_0.jpg

 

I guess this is technically the world's first consumer quad-core x86 SoC. Haswell will come in a single-chip solution as well but only as a dual-core part. Kabini needs no companion platform/IO controller chip, everything is integrated on this single piece of silicon. There are also two GCN compute units in there.

 

Anandtech:

 

 

On the power front, Kabini is great. In our tests we found much better battery life than Brazos and even better battery life than 17W Ultrabook-class Ivy Bridge parts. The days of AMD being associated with poor battery life are long gone.

 

Give me a reasonable Ultrabook-style chassis (or maybe a dockable tablet) with Kabini and a decent quality 1080p touchscreen and do it at the right price and there are plenty of people that will jump at the offer.

 

 

 

Pcperspective:

 

 

the jump from 2 to 4 gets a performance jump of 71% on the Kabini architecture but only 27% on the Core i3-2105 as we are seeing HyperThreading advantages exclusively.  Yes, the desktop part is much faster (about a factor of 2) but for the power budgets the A4-5000 continues to impress.

 

 

AMD's Kabini platform, as demonstrated by our A4-5000 reference platform today, looks to be a very promising solution for OEMs that want to build budget systems that mainstream performance and excellent battery life

 

 

Sweclockers:

 

 

it looks like the Kabini should be able to lie side by side in battery life with Intel's next generation processors: Haswell

 

 

The platform is also extremely cool and good for simpler games makes it even more interesting. AMD raises once again the bar for laptops in the lower end.

 

 

Notebookreview:

 

 

AMD continues its trend of increasing performance and decreasing power consumption with the latest generation of its APU chips. In the case of the AMD A4-5000M APU, we're talking about a processor that delivers close to the same performance as last-year's A10 chips but at a fraction of the battery drain. 

 

 

In truth, when AMD reps first told us we were getting an "mainstream" (budget) test configuration with an A4-series processor we didn't have high hopes for decent performance. Much to our surprise, the A4-5000M exceeded almost all of those expectations.

 

Δημοσ.

AMD Steamroller FX 9650 - 4.5 Ghz / 4.8 Ghz Turbo Benchmarks!

 
 
AMD Back in the High End

1090FX Entusiast

 
banner-roll.jpg 30% more Ops / Cycle = 20% IPC Benefit over Piledriver
 

Assuming 45% increase in performance vs Bulldozer (First Gen) and a 32% increase in performance vs Piledriver (Second Gen). This is taken directly from AMD!

 

 

IPC will lie somewhere between Nahelem and Sandy Bridge , falling behind Haswell by only 25-30%.

 

 

POV Ray 3.7 - Multithreaded Test Score
 
Intel
 
4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k : 1363
 
6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 1888
 
AMD
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 1505
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 1636
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 : 1985 
 
(determined with 32% increase in performance over the FX 8350)
 
 
Cinebench 11.5 Score - Single Core Test
 
Intel
 
 
4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k :  1.66
 
6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 1.62
 
AMD
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 1.11
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 1.21
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 :  1.47

 
Cinebench 11.5 Score - Multi-core Test

 

Intel
 
 
4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k :  7.52
 
6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 10.84
 
AMD
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 6.93
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 7.55
 
4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 :  9.15

 

source

 

---

 
Due to the 20% difference in single core performance when compared to Haswell, the FX 9650 will perform on par with a 2nd gen intel i7 2600k in gaming, still falling behind the 4770k by a hair when paired with two high end graphics card solutions. For games, like Crysis 3, that take advantage of more than 4 cores, the FX 9650 will perform on par with its intel counter parts. The 32 % performance increase comes with a 20% increase in IPC (vs Piledriver) and around a 10% Clock boost. 
 
 
The only downside with these chips is the overclockability. AMD generally pushes their stock clocks high enough to not leave any room for overclocking. Although AMD has put alot of effort into making these chips less power hungry, they only succeeded in allowing for higher clocks and typically higher overclock under the given TDP. The total power consumption is only 5-8% less than its FX 8350 counterpart. Unlike with the 4770k, which can handle a hefty +43% overclock from 3.5 Ghz to 5.0 Ghz , while the AMD FX 9650 will only handle a 20% overclock from 4.5 Ghz to 5.4 Ghz.

 

Note: It should deffinitly be noted that the intel processor overclocked to 5 Ghz will still use a whopping 40% less power than AMD's Steamroller Flagship. 

 
The FX 9650 will lie somewhere between the 4770k and the 4960x in performance, and the price will reflect that. To directly compete with the 4770k, AMD will release a cheaper variant clocked at 3.8 Ghz with a 4.2 Ghz Turbo. 
 
My Price estimate for AMD's flagship FX chip 4.5 Ghz with 4.8 Ghz Turbo is $449, with the lower model sporting a 3.8 Ghz / 4.2 Ghz Turbo Clock for $249. The FX 9650 will compete directly with the i7 4930k, while the FX 9450 will compete with the i7 4770k. 
 
You Choose Who will be King!

 

Update: *Given AMD's flagship Kaveri APU will sport 3M/6T , (source) it wll be interesting to see if AMD releases a 6M/12T Centurian FX variant flagship in the 900-1000 USD range. (If not  4M/8T) Although this chip will be plagued with terrible overclockability, it will nevertheless give the 4960x a run for its money. 

 

 

Πάνε αρκετά καλά πέρα από την κατανάλωση.

  • Like 1
Δημοσ.

Παιδιά ωραίος φαίνεται ο 9650 αλλά εγώ στάθηκα στην τιμή. Πολλά δεν είναι τα $449 για AMD cpu;

 

My Price estimate for AMD's flagship FX chip 4.5 Ghz with 4.8 Ghz Turbo is $449 
Δημοσ.

Παιδιά ωραίος φαίνεται ο 9650 αλλά εγώ στάθηκα στην τιμή. Πολλά δεν είναι τα $449 για AMD cpu;

μονο πολλα..καθαρη κλοπη θα ελεγα.

 

υ.γ απο δω πρεπει να μορφωνονται οι πιτσιρικαδες και μπουρδουκλοσαν τον 8350 με τον 9650.

ο 9650 συμφωνα με την παραπανω δημοσιευση ξεπερναει τον 3930.αλλα μεχρι να βγουν οι κανονικες μετρησεις...φατε ματια ψαρια :D

Δημοσ.

μονο πολλα..καθαρη κλοπη θα ελεγα.

 

υ.γ απο δω πρεπει να μορφωνονται οι πιτσιρικαδες και μπουρδουκλοσαν τον 8350 με τον 9650.

ο 9650 συμφωνα με την παραπανω δημοσιευση ξεπερναει τον 3930.αλλα μεχρι να βγουν οι κανονικες μετρησεις...φατε ματια ψαρια :D

αφου αυτον παει να κοντραρει(δεν τον ξεπερνα βεβαια,απλα πλησιαζει)

με τον 8350 συγκρινεται ο 9450

Δημοσ.

FM2+ SOCKET και AMD KAVERI τον IOYNIO ??? !!!! νέο ανανεωμένο roadmap της AMD !!!

Η AMD θα παρουσιάσει το νέο "FM2+" socket για τα νέα APUs με την κωδική ονομασία Kaveri εντός του 2013. Πιο συγκεκριμένα τα Kaveri θα παρουσιαστούν λίγο αργότερα από τα RICHLAND (Ιούνιο) και σε νέο FM2+ socket !!!
Το FM2+ socket θα φέρει για πρώτη φορά GDDR5/DDR4 μνήμες πράγμα που μάλλον θα βοηθήσει πολύ στην επίτευξη καλύτερων επιδόσεων στις IGP (γραφικά).

Οι νέοι επεξεργαστές θα φέρουν ολοκαίνουριο πυρήνα STEAMROLLER και την αρχιτεκτονική GCN στα γραφικά .

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=124460&d=136

 

http://wccftech.com/amd-kaveri-apus-compatible-socket-fm2-roadmap-confirms-launch-late-2013/

Δημιουργήστε ένα λογαριασμό ή συνδεθείτε για να σχολιάσετε

Πρέπει να είστε μέλος για να αφήσετε σχόλιο

Δημιουργία λογαριασμού

Εγγραφείτε με νέο λογαριασμό στην κοινότητα μας. Είναι πανεύκολο!

Δημιουργία νέου λογαριασμού

Σύνδεση

Έχετε ήδη λογαριασμό; Συνδεθείτε εδώ.

Συνδεθείτε τώρα

  • Δημιουργία νέου...