beez Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 deite to parakato ar8ro. exei poli endiaferon. http://web.icq.com/boards/post_message/?reply_to=1346944&tid=11865&page_num=&view_msg=%2Fboards%2Fview%5Fmessages%2F1%2C%2C%2C00%2Ehtml&msg_idx=
yannis27gr Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 Den fainetai kanena arthro afou zhtaei log in sto icq!
Billman Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 Δημοσ. 26 Μαρτίου 2003 Epeidh olos o kosmos den anhkei sthn ICQ community 8a kanw c/p to keimeno ( I am sorry fellow insomniacs ) Well, this was made using the Berlin`s University computer network.. A 2 Terabytes Data Base filled with millons political events that ocurred the last century. predicitions [ US led Iraqie Coup --> + The United States attacks Iraq through military action. + The United States establish a temporary occupation in Iraq. + The United States in Conjuction with "Iraq" establish a new government. + "Iraq" now "liberated". [ Iranian conflict --> + Iran and "liberated" Iraq involved in conflict(s). + The United States declares again, Iran is a terrorist run state. + The United States declares again, Iran is a threat. [ US led Iranian Coup --> + The United States retaliates against Iran in a military action. + The United States establishes a new Iranian government. -- The United States has an nuclear ally in the middle east, namely Israel. The United States has established a military coup in Afghanistan (whatever the leadup, the events taken place, are a military action resulting in the establishment of a new government - a military coup). The United States is preparing for war against Iraq. The United States has declared that Saddam must go. The United States has declared that they must liberate Iraq and establish a government to sustain this. The United States has declared that they will occupy Iraq in this case to stablise the country. The United States has declared that they will use heavy ground forces in a military action against Iraq. The United States has declared that Iran is part of the Axis of Evil. The United States has declared that Iran is a state supporting and harbouring terrorists. Iran is geographically located next to Iraq. The above would give the United States 4 allies and / or occupations in the Middle East; Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran. Thats a strong US presence in the Middle East ! [ Question marks --> North Korea North Korea has been declared as being part of the Axis of Evil, and a state sponsering terrorism. Is the United States prepared to act against North Korea at this point or are they concentrating primarily on the Middle East only? North Korea's nuclear weapons program is interesting in relation to US foreign policy. Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia is declared as home of "Bin Laden" in some statements. The United States has used military bases in Saudi Arabia in the past. Saudi Arabia does not appear to happy in recent times to continue the US operations at its bases. China China has opposed a US military strike against Iraq in the UN. The United States seems unlikely to go into a major conflict with China, in consideration of the military power China maintains. England An obvious strong ally of the United States. Recent "terrorist" arrests in the UK are of interest. Europe in general is quite paranoid about terrorism (pre 9/11; eg, try leaving a package or bag unattended on the tube in the UK, or a the same in an airport in France), but the UK is showing an attitude that is quite disturbing with its unilateral alignment with the United States. [ Timeframes --> Bush has another 2 years on his current term of presidency. It seems likely in the next year, it is the likely time for the military action against Iraq (it was converging very quickly, but appears delayed now with the declarion of Iraq to follow the UN (US?) proposal of weapons inspections - It still does not look good, and it is expected that a conflict will still occur irrespective of Iraqie compliance (the US press statements are laughable on this matter). If an Iraqie coup occurs during this time, it leaves Bush with one more year for Iran before he is up for re-election. It seems likely that an Iranian conflict will escalte approaching the elections. The United States allows two consecutive terms for a president, so assuming the worst that Bush stays in office for a second term, he has 6 years to conduct anything he desires. For now, the next two years seem to be the most worrisome since its unlikely things will change siginificantly in these regards. It's also worrisome that the republicans increased power and hold full political power in the US, from the mid-term elections. It is suprising to be honest; political dissent internal to the US population increased significantly leading up the votes. It appears that although significant numbers within the US were in political opposition (including a number of US independant media outlets) to the Bush doctrine (as it's been termed by some people), the election results did not reflect this, and instead showed a swing in the opposite. The mid-terms would re-enforce the foreign policy of Bush, and seem to establish a view that military action against Iraq has been affirmed by the US population; something that seems rather out of sync with the sheer number of protests witnessed on the streets. Australia has also shown significant backlash (as with many other countries), to Bush's policies, and it might be interesting to see how our own elections go in the future. The Australian mainstream media (as with the US), is also quite polarized in terms of its reporting; Australia is being witness to a massive number of protests, some of which receive simply no press coverage at all (even if city streets are shutdown and heavy police presence is brought in for dispersion). It is curious to see how this is reflected in future elections. The Green's seem to be showing an interesting (and promosing) attitude in their reaction to police actions, in such things as the events surrounding the WTO, civil disobediance and the use of force. In recent protests, a media reporter was trampled by a horse. SBS played interesting footage showing a couple of people being charged by horses without visible provokation by the protesters, or warning by police. This seemingly contradicts the statements of other reports indicating the reporter falling backwards under the police horses, or a crowd rush occuring. The Green's apparently are increasing support in the poles, so it will be something to watch for in the future. Now that you had readed this simulation.. I tell you it was made 04/05/2002 perturbating right ?
Προτεινόμενες αναρτήσεις
Αρχειοθετημένο
Αυτό το θέμα έχει αρχειοθετηθεί και είναι κλειστό για περαιτέρω απαντήσεις.