grimpr Δημοσ. 15 Νοεμβρίου 2008 Share Δημοσ. 15 Νοεμβρίου 2008 Ενα απλό copy paste και τίποτα παραπάνω, τα σχόλια δικά σας. http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/index.cfm?action=detail&id=94178&threadid=94137&roomid=2 Name: Linus Torvalds ([email protected]) 11/4/08 Leland C. Scott ([email protected]) on 11/4/08 wrote: > >Anybody install Linux on one of these yet? If so how well >did it work? I've been using a Nehalem for the last few months as my main machine. I'm very happy with it, both for single- threaded performance (most of what I do, notably just about all of my SCM workflow), and for doing full kernel compiles in 16 seconds by utilizing four cores and HT. According to DMI, my board is an Intel DX58SO. Performance is definitely fine. I could have tweaked it a bit more (for example: I've populated all four DIMM's, for best performance I should have done just three), but I really don't have any complaints. That said: - I'd have actually preferred Intel's integrated graphics, rather than external ones. The chipset selection is pretty limited right now. I don't think there are any IGP boards yet. - I don't really need quad-core. Yes, it allows me to compile my kernel in 16 seconds, but if I end up going to disk, it takes about a minute. IOW, the only case where I personally really use quad cores, I really could have easily done with just two, and a faster disk. I would have lost some for the best case, but come ahead on average. Two cores would already be plenty fast. - I like my machines small and silent. It's one of the reasons I'll go for an IGP any day. Intel development boxes don't tend to be "small and silent", and the fans in the power supply/graphics card/CPU aren't all that optimal. But I really haven't found anything to complain about in the CPU itself. All my complaints are related to the fact that it's new and only comes in a few SKU and with just a few system options. But the core really does work really well. The locking costs are down by about 40% (I did the exact cycle benchmarking when I got the machine and compared it side by side to my previous woodcrest one, and I've forgotten the exact numbers). The new cache hierarchy seems to work very well indeed. The integrated memory controllers give great bandwidth, even if I have not tried to optimize it. IOW, looks like a winner to me. Linus Συνδέστε για να σχολιάσετε Κοινοποίηση σε άλλες σελίδες άλλες επιλογές
parsifal Δημοσ. 15 Νοεμβρίου 2008 Share Δημοσ. 15 Νοεμβρίου 2008 Υπάρχει link; Αν ναι, δέον είναι να αναφερθεί πάραυτα... Συνδέστε για να σχολιάσετε Κοινοποίηση σε άλλες σελίδες άλλες επιλογές
Προτεινόμενες αναρτήσεις
Αρχειοθετημένο
Αυτό το θέμα έχει αρχειοθετηθεί και είναι κλειστό για περαιτέρω απαντήσεις.